- [1] Melonfield understands sound, including the inaudible, as something that both reflects and actively conditions places, networks, relationships, and publics.  We approach “the field” (implied in field recording or field research) as any context formed through shared attention.
 - 
[2] Melonfield proposes alternatives to the conventions of “neutral” documenting and archiving. We understand that in aggregating material we also make ourselves vulnerable to extractive activity. We are interested in the possibilities of noise, distortion, and sound experimentation as methods of encryption.
 - 
[3] Contributions to the commons serve to illustrate how we can attune to our shared environments, within and beyond existing infrastructures for listening. Melonfield is a shared environment in and of itself.
 - [4] We make no commitment to permanence.
 - [5] Anything can be co-opted. Melonfield encourages caution in what you record and share.
 - [6] Anything can be co-opted. Melonfield encourages experimentation in how submissions might anticipate or subvert this.
 
resources
- 
Sonic Insurgency Research Group  (S-I-R-G)
 - 
Fieldwork for Future Ecologies, Onomatopee
 - 
David Graeber, “Exchange”, Critical Terms for Media Studies, 2010 
 - 
“Sonic Continuum”, The Contemporary Journal, 2020–21
 - 
Sonic Investigations, Luxembourg Pavilion Venice Biennale
 - 
Hip-Hop Cosmologies - Critical Black Folklore Studies - Bibliography
 - 
“Sounding out Place and Cultural Memory in Tempelhofer”, Lex, 2019
 - 
Acoustic Territories - Sound Culture and Everyday Life, LaBelle, 2010
 - 
On Musical Mediation - Ontology, Technology, and Creativity, Born, 2005
 - 
The Digital Age of the Sound Environment, Nowak, 2010 - abstract only
 - 
Ubiquitous Musics, Kassabian, Boschi, & Garcia Quinones, 2013
 - 
Sound Art and the Making of Public Space, Bailey, 2020
 - 
Musicking - The Meanings of Performing and Listening, Small, 1998
 - 
Musical Time.Musical Space, Morgan, 2003
 - 
Noisy Field Exposures, or what comes before attunement, Zhang, 2020
 - 
Urban Auscultation - or, Perceiving the Action of the Heart
 - 
Critical Urban Futures Sensorium - Sound, Fearns & Schmitt, 2018
 - Neurodiversity and the Ethnomusicology of Autism, Bakan, 2014
 - Sonic geographies - Exploring phonographic methods, Gallagher & Prior, 2014
 - 
Staging Critical History Within the Space of the Beat, Marshall, 2015
 - 
On Musical Mediation - Ontology, Technology, and Creativity, Born, 2005
 - 
Sound Machine, Roald Dahl
 - 
Rebellion-Invention-Groove, McKittrick, 2016
 - 
A Sonic Geography of Voice - Towards an Affective Politics, Kanngieser, 2011
 - 
“Sounding Ruins - Reflections on the Production of an Audio Drift”, Gallagher, 2015
 - 
On the Disability Aesthetics of Music - Colloquy, Howe, Jensen-Moulton, et al., 2016
 - 
The Soundscape - Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World, Schafer, 1994
 - 
A brief proposition toward a sonic geo-politics - Rajarhat New Town, Kanngieser, 2016
 - 
Spaces Speak, Are You Listening - Experiencing Aural Architecture, Blesser & Salter, 2006
 - 
“Interludes in Madtime - Black Music, Madness, and Metaphysical Syncopation”, Bruce, 2017
 - 
Investigating Sound in Space - Five Meanings of Space in Music and Sound Art, Macedo, 2017
 - 
Synchronization and Syncopation - Conceptualizing Autism Through Rhythm, Christensen, 2021
 - 
Musical Space and Architectural Time - Open Scoring Versus Linear Processes, Hanoch-Roe, 2003
 - 
“Listening geographies - Landscape, Affect, and Geotechnologies”, Gallagher, Kanngieser, & Prior, 2016
 - 
“The Exploratory and the Performative in the Soundscape Composition Resounding Reverie”, Czink, 2016
 - “Soundscapes of Material and Immaterial Qualities of Urban Spaces”, Nielsen, Jorgensen, & Braae, 2019